Left 4 Green: Quad_Tube - Viewing Profile - Left 4 Green

Jump to content

Toggle shoutbox Thu'umbox

Ywa  : (25 May 2012 - 19:27) Broken car is broken
Ywa  : (25 May 2012 - 19:27) http://bbqfiles.com/u/RMClient_2012-05-25_20-23-08-43_50e3.png
Shock120  : (25 May 2012 - 18:23) We do
Mansen  : (25 May 2012 - 17:41) You guys don't use the IRC anymore?
Reiska  : (25 May 2012 - 17:26) ballface.jpg
AutomatedMoose  : (25 May 2012 - 16:18) trollface.jpg
Baron Baconeer  : (25 May 2012 - 16:10) GET ME MY FLAMETHROWER
Baron Baconeer  : (25 May 2012 - 16:10) PONYPICTURE ON THE FORUMS
Baron Baconeer  : (25 May 2012 - 16:10) PONYPICTURE
Baron Baconeer  : (25 May 2012 - 16:10) AGH
Chikennugget1  : (25 May 2012 - 15:23) Figthing on horses in Skyrim \o/
Ywa  : (25 May 2012 - 13:03) That should fix your problem
Ywa  : (25 May 2012 - 13:03) This: http://support.amd.com/us/Pages/dynamicDetails.aspx?ListID=c5cd2c08-1432-4756-aafa-4d9dc646342f&ItemID=153
Ywa  : (25 May 2012 - 13:02) Quad_Tube, you need to install the AMD multi-core optimizer
Quad_Tube  : (25 May 2012 - 12:45) (ref: am using AMD Athlon64 x2 and Windows XP 32-Bit)
Quad_Tube  : (25 May 2012 - 12:44) I can assign GTA.EXE to its own core using a DOS command, maybe this would make it even smoother.
Quad_Tube  : (25 May 2012 - 12:42) Just wondering what impact it would have running GTA even though GTA is not multi-threaded.
Quad_Tube  : (25 May 2012 - 12:42) (non-spam). Has anyone used this? http://www.ashampoo.com/en/usd/pin/0161/System_Utilities/Ashampoo-Core-Tuner-2
Analdin  : (25 May 2012 - 09:52) achievements
Hundred2  : (24 May 2012 - 23:31) Good Night.
Resize Shouts Area

Reputation: 1 Neutral
Group:
Members
Active Posts:
22 (0.02 per day)
Most Active In:
Bans & Unbans (12 posts)
Joined:
14-November 09
Profile Views:
4,687
Last Active:
User is offline Today, 16:55
Currently:
Offline

My Information

Member Title:
Zombie Meat
Age:
Age Unknown
Birthday:
Birthday Unknown
Gender:
Not Telling Not Telling

Contact Information

E-mail:
Private

Latest Visitors

Posts I've Made

  1. In Topic: -]ALW[-pondfiller

    10 November 2011 - 05:29

    Posted Image
  2. In Topic: -]ALW[-pondfiller

    10 November 2011 - 05:11

    View Postbesweeet, on 10 November 2011 - 04:54, said:

    View PostQuad_Tube, on 10 November 2011 - 04:49, said:

    View PostalwTicToc, on 10 November 2011 - 04:18, said:

    I think your "oversight" may just have had something to do with a recent ban on the alw server? Timing is strangly convenient....


    Ban or no ban, it does not give you automatic right to comment on this case.


    Actually, it does. Being as we're the players of the server (and you aren't, and never have been), we have an immediate say on anything that goes on.

    Think of the players are shareholders of a company (especially for those of us who've donated). As such, we expect to be able to take part in various conversations, internal issues, etc.

    Even Gmail thinks that your content is spam, as every time a reply email shows up, it's automatically moved into the spam box while the replies from Tic, Taint, etc. are not.


    I have been and continue to be a player of this server, whether you like it or not. You’re just going to have to deal with it.

    Whatever transpires on ALW, it is NOT automatic right to disregard the policy on this one, as in sticking your nose into someone else’s complaint on this server.

    Your Gmail account is not my problem and it is not even relevant to this thread.

    Admins, it seems this person is clearly stalling, and just wants to argue for the sake of arguing. I'll be back later hopefully when they've gone or when they've found something slight more interesting to occupy their mind with..

    Good night :)

    p.s. I think this comment, by someone not involved in this case, demonstrates the utter disregard they have for your rules..

    Quote

    This thread isn't about pond or his impersonations of an administrator.
  3. In Topic: -]ALW[-pondfiller

    10 November 2011 - 04:56

    View Postbesweeet, on 10 November 2011 - 04:47, said:

    I've already posted all of the proof. You're failing to accept it because you don't seem to like it when people are talking negatively about you, hence why you'll never change.

    // lock this


    You haven't posted proof. You've posted opinions, and in a case which doesn't involve you. You've consistently refused to take your problems to the appropriate area. Why should this thread be locked on your account? You're not even involved :rolleyes:
  4. In Topic: -]ALW[-pondfiller

    10 November 2011 - 04:49

    View PostalwTicToc, on 10 November 2011 - 04:18, said:

    I think your "oversight" may just have had something to do with a recent ban on the alw server? Timing is strangly convenient....


    Ban or no ban, it does not give you automatic right to comment on this case.
  5. In Topic: -]ALW[-pondfiller

    10 November 2011 - 04:43

    View Postbesweeet, on 10 November 2011 - 04:10, said:

    Just as we've all stated everywhere else, these are all true facts of you and aren't any opinions, fake accusations, or anything else. References to other servers are nothing but relevant to this, as you always start things when the majority of the matter isn't a big deal whatsoever.


    This report is not related to everywhere else including your references to other servers.

    View Postbesweeet, on 10 November 2011 - 04:10, said:

    The rule was broken, yes. However, exceptions can be made for nearly every rule, and warnings can be handed out. In this case, according to your "evidence", the case is, again, very minimal to where a warning is the only logical punishment.


    You’re not an admin - you don’t govern what is and what is no, a punishable offense. If other players people fake names and they’re banned for it, you are treated the same. Arguing the toss on a complaint that doesn’t involve you won’t change this.

    View Postbesweeet, on 10 November 2011 - 04:10, said:

    The fact that I'm not involved in this case is irrelevant in the matter that I'm not allowed to voice my opinions, facts, and evidence about you and the "cause".


    Server rules state that only those involved should comment. I was involved, I was present at the time and I made the complaint.

    You are allowed to voice whatever you like about me within reason and law, I’ve already stated this. Nobody is stopping you from doing it in the appropriate section.

    View Postbesweeet, on 10 November 2011 - 04:10, said:

    YOU'RE the argumentative prick. You never, EVER let ANYTHING go. You keep digging yourself into your own hole (and grave). YOU'RE the one who can't move on.


    Look who’s talking? You keep hanging around this thread sticking your nose in.

    View Postbesweeet, on 10 November 2011 - 04:10, said:

    You're continuing to avoid your [many] issues by just keeping putting yourself into a circle.


    Then by all means, make a formal complaint. You keep avoiding doing that by posting here, in someone else’s thread. I wonder why you’re incapable of doing that.

    View Postbesweeet, on 10 November 2011 - 04:10, said:

    We thought you would've learned by now that your reports and "following of the rules" are wastes of everybody's time.


    I thought by now you’d be able to read Yoshi’s response, but of course, you can’t read the PM’s I’ve received from admins..

    View Postbesweeet, on 10 November 2011 - 04:10, said:

    You're offering nothing positive to this community. Instead, you're only causing problems (just like a few other communities). You keep going on and on and on and on and on and on and on until you're finally kicked out. THEN, you get back to where you were previously let go.


    Well, like I keep saying and like you keep ignoring, post your complaint in the appropriate place. You don’t know what my interests are or all the communities I support, but you clearly intend to clutch at straws doing it. You’re the one who came in here flaming and trolling me, not the other way round.

    Whatever you claim to have against me on here, post it – in the right place. Bck it up with whatever proof you think you have. As it stands you are not involved in this dispute, in which I have provided my proof and posted it in the correct format. You however have flat out refused to do the same which suggests to me you have no intention of respecting this server’s rules and are more interested in flaming me. Prove it by making your own thread so that your problems can be addressed accordingly.

Comments

Page 1 of 1
  1. Photo

    Dr. Pannenkoek 

    09 May 2012 - 22:16
    Tis me, and yes it's in Nevada... near Death Valley if I recall...
  2. Photo

    Chikennugget1 

    14 Mar 2012 - 23:20
    Jajaja ! But a tablet is expensive :V
  3. Photo

    Tom Klijbroek 

    29 Oct 2011 - 03:19
    Objection overruled, you may continue.
Page 1 of 1